
After years of development, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has implemented the final phase of its National Registry II rule. As of June 25, 2025, full compliance is required. The rule modernizes how medical certification data is shared and verified, impacting commercial learner’s permit (CLP) applicants, commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders, motor carriers, state driver licensing agencies (SDLAs) and medical examiners.
Previously, drivers submitted paper Medical Examiner’s Certificates (MECs) to state agencies, and carriers verified their legitimacy. This manual process created delays, data mismatches and fraud potential. The updated rule eliminates these issues through electronic integration between FMCSA’s National Registry and the Commercial Driver’s License Information System (CDLIS).
While parts of the rule were implemented earlier, full integration was delayed until 2025 due to IT system complexity. With the final compliance date now in effect, key changes are live.
For drivers (CLP applicants and CDL holders):
- CLP applicants and CDL holders no longer need to submit a paper MEC to their state.
- Exam results—qualified, unqualified or voided—are now sent electronically from FMCSA to the SDLAs and added to the driver’s record.
- Medical examiners no longer issue paper certificates unless requested, but these copies are not valid as official proof.
For state driver licensing agencies:
- SDLAs must post all electronic exam results, variances (e.g., exemptions) and restrictions to the CDLIS driver motor vehicle record (MVR).
- The electronic record now serves as the official source for proof of medical certification.
For motor carriers:
- Carriers are no longer responsible for verifying that a driver’s certificate came from a certified examiner.
- Carriers must obtain the driver’s MVR from the state and record medical certification and any variances in the qualification file.
- The paper certificate is no longer acceptable as proof of medical certification.
For medical examiners:
- Medical examiners must continue submitting results by midnight the next calendar day via the National Registry.
- They must now correct submission errors flagged in their registry account, especially when data fails to match a driver’s record at the SDLA.
- They are not required to print or distribute the MEC unless requested by the driver.
For law enforcement:
- Officers will verify a driver’s medical certification exclusively through the CDLIS driver MVR, not by reviewing a paper certificate.
This update represents a significant shift in medical certification compliance. By replacing manual processes, FMCSA improves driver qualification data’s accuracy, security and efficiency. Motor carriers must now rely on MVRs to verify certification and should update their compliance procedures accordingly. Drivers should note that paper certificates are no longer valid proof of medical fitness.
Contact us to see how you could minimize risk:
- Transportation|
Recent News
How Commercial Insurance Applications Affect Your Coverage
When businesses purchase commercial insurance, they often focus on limits, deductibles and policy terms. Yet the insurance application is equally important. It is a legal document insurers use to evaluate risk, determine eligibility and establish coverage terms and pricing.
Seubert Celebrates 10 Years on Pittsburgh’s North Shore
Seubert & Associates celebrates 10 years at its Pittsburgh North Shore headquarters with a look at its growth and newly renovated office.
Employee Spotlight: Mariah Gigler
Please join us in welcoming Mariah Gigler to the Seubert Team!
DOL Proposes to Expand Electronic Delivery Options for Group Health Plans
On July 23, 2026, the U.S. DOL issued a proposed rule that would establish a new, additional safe harbor for group health plan administrators to use electronic media to furnish plan disclosures required under the ERISA.
Employee Spotlight: Delany Graff
Please join us in welcoming Delany Graff to Seubert’s Admin Department as an Accounting Clerk!
Compliance Update: Federal Agencies Issue FAQs Addressing Key Issues in Health Plan Tobacco Surcharge Lawsuits
Federal agencies have issued new FAQ guidance addressing two issues at the center of tobacco surcharge class-action lawsuits: when the full wellness program reward must be provided, and what employee notice is required. Here’s what employers need to know.

