
Contractual risk transfer (CRT) involves shifting financial responsibility for specific risks from one party to another within a contract. This risk management strategy is crucial for construction employers, as it places liability on subcontractors, vendors, or service providers. In this way, CRT protects employers’ margins, reduces uninsured losses, and helps ensure insurance coverage for losses.
This article outlines key components of CRT, discusses common weaknesses in construction contracts, and provides best practices for CRT.
Components of CRT
The following are critical elements of effective CRT:
- Indemnification clauses within contracts require one party, usually the subcontractor, to defend and indemnify the employer for specific claims, such as third-party bodily injury, property damage, and defense costs. However, many states have anti-indemnity statutes, so employers must ensure their contracts comply with local regulations.
- Additional insured (AI) requirements require upstream parties, such as owners, general contractors, or construction managers, to be named as AIs. Construction employers usually require AIs on commercial general liability (CGL), auto, and umbrella policies. Contracts should specify primary and noncontributory wording and require AI coverage for ongoing and completed operations.
- Insurance requirements ensure subcontractors have adequate coverage. Within contracts, employers should mandate minimum limits, designate a preference for occurrence or claims-made policies, and detail required endorsements, such as CG 20 10 for ongoing operations and CG 20 37 for completed operations.
- Waivers of subrogation prevent an insurer from seeking reimbursement from the employer after paying a claim, thereby preserving the intended risk allocation. These waivers are commonly found in conjunction with CGL, workers’ compensation, and builders’ risk policies.
Common Weaknesses in Contracts
Construction contracts may omit critical provisions or language, thereby undermining CRT and exposing the employer to potential risks. Common issues include:
- Lacking indemnification language or using vague language
- Listing AI endorsements that do not match the contract
- Not obtaining or reviewing certificates of insurance (COIs)
- Relying on outdated or expired endorsements
- Not flowing down requirements to subcontractors
CRT Best Practices
Construction employers should implement the following strategies to ensure effective CRT and reduce exposures:
- Conduct a pre-contract review. This ensures all risk-transfer requirements are included in the contract. Confirm that the indemnity language aligns with insurance requirements and the law, that AI coverage is mandated for operations, and that subrogation waivers and adequate limits are in place.
- Prequalify subcontractors. Review their experience modification rate and total recordable incident rate. Verify that they meet safety, financial, and insurance standards.
- Perform audits annually. This maintains ongoing compliance efforts with insurance and contract requirements. Track policy expirations, request updated COIs and endorsements, and ensure subcontractors maintain insurance limits.
- Document everything. Keep contracts, COIs, endorsements, change orders, and approved exceptions. Accurate recordkeeping can help with claims handling and reduce disputes.
Contact us to see how you could minimize risk:
- Construction|
Recent News
How Commercial Insurance Applications Affect Your Coverage
When businesses purchase commercial insurance, they often focus on limits, deductibles and policy terms. Yet the insurance application is equally important. It is a legal document insurers use to evaluate risk, determine eligibility and establish coverage terms and pricing.
Seubert Celebrates 10 Years on Pittsburgh’s North Shore
Seubert & Associates celebrates 10 years at its Pittsburgh North Shore headquarters with a look at its growth and newly renovated office.
Employee Spotlight: Mariah Gigler
Please join us in welcoming Mariah Gigler to the Seubert Team!
DOL Proposes to Expand Electronic Delivery Options for Group Health Plans
On July 23, 2026, the U.S. DOL issued a proposed rule that would establish a new, additional safe harbor for group health plan administrators to use electronic media to furnish plan disclosures required under the ERISA.
Employee Spotlight: Delany Graff
Please join us in welcoming Delany Graff to Seubert’s Admin Department as an Accounting Clerk!
Compliance Update: Federal Agencies Issue FAQs Addressing Key Issues in Health Plan Tobacco Surcharge Lawsuits
Federal agencies have issued new FAQ guidance addressing two issues at the center of tobacco surcharge class-action lawsuits: when the full wellness program reward must be provided, and what employee notice is required. Here’s what employers need to know.

